THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY AS A KEY ELEMENT IN FORMING GLOBAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

  • Iryna Chistiakova Author
  • Iryna Kudlai Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60022/3(5)-64S

Keywords:

right to privacy, artificial intelligence, international law, GDPR, AI Act, human rights, personal data

Abstract

This article examines the right to privacy as a fundamental element in shaping the global  regulatory framework for artificial intelligence (AI). The rapid development of AI technologies has led to significant transformations in traditional approaches to privacy protection, particularly in the context of algorithmic profiling, big data processing, and biometric surveillance. The study analyzes key international legal instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as modern regulatory frameworks such as the General Data Protection Regulation and the Artificial Intelligence Act. It is argued that the right to privacy is evolving into a central principle guiding AI Act at the global level. Special attention is paid to the role of international organizations, including the United Nations and the Council of Europe, in establishing universal standards in the field of digital rights. The article highlights the fragmentation of global regulation and the competition between different regulatory models. It is concluded that the development of artificial intelligence significantly transforms the content of the right to privacy in modern international relations. It acts not only as an object of protection, but also as a system-forming principle of regulating artificial intelligence, which determines the boundaries of permissible use of technologies. Effective protection of the right to privacy in the digital age will largely depend on the ability of international organizations and states to ensure transparency of control over data processing and compliance with the principles of international human rights law. The international community is faced with the need to form universal international legal standards for regulating artificial intelligence, which would ensure a balance between technological development, national security and observance of fundamental human rights. Directions for harmonizing international approaches and strengthening human rights-oriented regulation of AI are proposed.

References

1. суспільство. 2021. № 4. С. 98–104.

2. Література Баранов О. А. Штучний інтелект і захист персональних даних: правові виклики. Право і Гриценко І. С. Право на приватність у системі прав людини. Право України. 2012. № 3. С. 45–52.

3. Костецька Т. А. Адаптація законодавства України до стандартів GDPR. Європейське право. 2020. № 2. С. 67–73.

4. Кохановська О. В. Захист персональних даних як елемент права на приватність. Юридична наука. 2017. № 2. С. 112–118.

5. Рабінович П. М. Основи загальної теорії права та держави. Львів: Край, 2015. 320 с.

6. Ткачук Т. Ю. Інформаційна безпека та право на приватність у цифрову епоху. Інформаційне право. 2019. № 1. С. 25–31.

7. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights). Rome, 1950. URL: https://www.echr.coe.int (дата звернення: 06.04.2026).

8. European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. Brussels, 2021. URL: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence (дата звернення: 05.04.2026).

9. European Commission. AI Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels, 2019. P. 1–36.

10. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)). Official Journal of the European Union. 2016. L 119. P. 1–88.

11. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act)). Official Journal of the European Union. 2024. Р. 3-10.

12. Universal Declaration of Human Rights: adopted and proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948. Art. 12. URL: https://www.un.org/ en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (дата звернення: 06.04.2026).

13. U.S. National AI Initiative Act, 2020. URL: https://www.congress.gov/ bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6216 (дата звернення: 05.04.2026).

14. Abbott K., Snidal D. The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions. Harvard International Law Journal. 2020. P. 45–52.

15. Barocas S., Selbst A. Big Data’s Disparate Impact. California Law Review. 2016. Vol. 104. P. 671–732.

16. Bradford A. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press, 2020. Р. 15-22.

17. Calo R. Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap. U.C. Davis Law Review. 2017. Vol. 51. P. 399–435.

18. Cath C. Governing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, Legal and Technical Opportunities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2018. Р. 5-9.

19. Creemers R. China’s Approach to AI Governance. Journal of Cyber Policy. 2021. P. 112–118.

20. De Hert P., Papakonstantinou V. The New General Data Protection Regulation: Still a Sound System for the Protection of Individuals? Computer Law & Security Review. 2016. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 179–194.

21. Floridi L. et al. AI4People-An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society. Minds and Machines. 2018. Vol. 28. P. 689–707.

22. Goodfellow I., Bengio Y., Courville A. Deep Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. 775 p.

23. Marchant G., Wallach W. Coordinating Technology Governance. Issues in Science and Technology. 2015. Vol. 31. P. 37–46, 380-385.

24. Nemitz P., Pfeffer M. Principles and Limits of AI Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2020. Р. 145–150.

25. Nissenbaum H. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010. 288 p.

26. O’Neil C. Weapons of Math Destruction. New York: Crown, 2016. 259 p.

27. Pasquale F. The Black Box Society. Harvard University Press, 2015. 320 p.

28. Roberts H., Cowls J., Morley J. et al. The Chinese Approach to AI Governance. AI & Society. 2021. P. 1–18. 29. 3. P. 477–564.

30. Solove D. J. A Taxonomy of Privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 2006. Vol. 154. №. Solove D. J. The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. George Washington Law Review. 2021. Vol. 89. P. 1–51.

31. Veale M., Borgesius F. Z. Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Computer Law Review International. 2021. P. 97–112.

32. Wachter S., Mittelstadt B., Floridi L. Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the GDPR. International Data Privacy Law. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 76–99.

33. Warren S., Brandeis L. The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review. 1890. Vol. 4. №. 5. P. 193–220.

34. Westin A. F. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum, 1967. 487 p.

35. Zuboff S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019. 704 p.

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

Chistiakova, I., & Kudlai, I. (2026). THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY AS A KEY ELEMENT IN FORMING GLOBAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Current Problems of Sustainable Development, 3(5), 548-558. https://doi.org/10.60022/3(5)-64S