REMOTE SENSING AND LAND MONITORING AS A TOOL FOR ECONOMIC PLANNING, DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/3(6)-18SKeywords:
remote sensing of the Earth, geographic information systems, digital transformation, economic planning, territorial communities, sustainable development, satellite monitoring, digital governanceAbstract
The article examines the theoretical, methodological, and applied aspects of using remote sensing (RS) and geospatial monitoring systems in the context of digital transformation and sustainable development of territorial communities. The role of geoinformation approaches in creating an integrated information and analytical environment for supporting management decisions at local and regional levels is substantiated. The study analyzes satellite observation technologies, geographic information systems (GIS), digital geoplatforms, unmanned aerial vehicles, and spatial data analysis methods. It is shown that remote sensing provides timely, objective, and spatially referenced information on natural resources, land use, infrastructure, ecosystems, and economic activity, improving the monitoring of territorial processes. Particular attention is paid to integrating geospatial data into economic planning, land management, urban development, environmental monitoring, and assessment of territorial potential. GIS technologies are identified as effective tools for modeling development scenarios, assessing risks, detecting territorial disparities, and optimizing infrastructure management. The research proves that combining remote sensing with digital data platforms supports the implementation of «data-driven governance», where decisions rely on analytical data, spatial modeling, and forecasting. Integration of remote monitoring into local government activities enhances transparency, resource efficiency, investment attractiveness, and sustainable development management. The prospects for developing digital communities, geoanalytical centers, and unified spatial information environments integrated with e-governance systems are highlighted. The findings confirm that geospatial technologies are becoming a key component of the digital economy and an important tool for strengthening the resilience of territorial communities to environmental, economic, and social challenges.
References
1. Braslavska O. (2025). GIS technologies and remote sensing in monitoring land use changes. Urban Development and Spatial Planning. № 89. pp. 472–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2025.89.472-487
2. Lazareva O. V., Vakar K. V., Platonova K. A. (2019) The objective necessity of implementing GIS technologies in the land resources management system. Agrosvit. № 22. pp. 48–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2019.22.48
3. Biliavskyi M. (2025) Development of a methodology for digital modeling of community land use and land tenure. Ukrainian journal of applied economics and technology. Volume 10. № 1. рр. 133–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2025-1-22
4. Rudomakha A. V. (2019) Geoinformation analysis of land use of united territorial communities. Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: technical sciences. Issue 30(69). pp. 181–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-5941/2019.5-2/32
5. Koshkalda I., Dombrovska O., Sopov D., Butov A. (2021) Geoinformation technologies in industrial cadastre: directions of development. Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology. Volume 6. № 4. рр. 249–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2021-4-30
6. Shevchuk S. M., Prokopenko N. I., Rozhi T. A. (2024) Analysis of the use of geodetic data in planning and monitoring of agricultural landscapes: optimization of land use and nature protection. Spatial Development. Issue 7. pp. 445–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2024.7.445-458
7. Dovgyi S. O. (2020) Remote sensing of the Earth: analysis of space images in geoinformation systems: a teaching and methodological manual / S. O. Dovgyi et al. Kyiv: National Center «Small Academy of Sciences of Ukraine», 268 p.
8. Bondarchuk N. V., Simonov S. V. (2025) Digital transformation of local government bodies as a tool for sustainable development. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian University. Series «Public Management and Administration». № 4. pp. 60–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/pdau.pma.2025.4.10
9. Kokhan S. S., Vostokov A. B. (2019) Remote sensing of the Earth: theoretical foundations: textbook. Kyiv: Higher School, 460 p.
10. Sihag S., Meena R. S., Sheoran S., Jhariya M. K., Kumar M. Banerjee A., Raj A. (2021) Remote sensing for agriculture and resource management. Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability. pp. 91–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822976-7.00012-0
11. Martin Kornberger, Clarissa Ruth Marie Schott, Dan-Richard Knudsen, Christian Andvik (2025). Mapping data-driven management in accounting: the premise and promise of the debate and how to move beyond. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. № 22(2). pp. 186–198. DOI: https://doi.
org/10.1108/QRAM-08-2024-0172
12. Kvitka S., Korsun V., Magilyas Y. (2024) Digital transformation of public administration: promising research directions. Aspects of public administration. № 12(3). pp. 50–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/152437
13. Lyalko V. I., Popov M. O., Sedlerova O. V., Fedorovsky O. D., Stankevych S. A., Yelistratova L. O., Filipovych V. Ye., Khyzhnyak A. V. (2022) Towards the development of methods and technologies of remote sensing of the Earth in Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Remote Sensing of the Earth. № 9(2). pp. 43–53. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36023/ujrs.2022.9.2.214
14. Khainus D. D., Sopov D. S., Knyaz O. V., Sadovyi I. I., Grek M. O. (2025) Standardization in geodesy, land management and land valuation. Municipal utilities. Series: «Information technologies and engineering». № 4(192) pp. 267–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33042//3083-6727-2025-4-192-267-271
15. Dorozhko E., Sklyar Yu., Shemyakin M. (2025) Satellite technologies in geodesy and land management: integration potential and modern challenges for Ukraine. Spatial development. № 13. pp. 498–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2025.13.498-513
16. Kravchuk M. (2026) Integration of remote sensing data and geographic information systems in the formation of digital land use models of territorial communities. Technical Sciences and Technologies. № 2(44). pp. 600–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5363-2026-2(44)-600-611
17. Dmytro Khainus, Tetiana Anopriienko, Dmytro Sopov, Alona Iukhno, Mykola Savchenko (2022). Perspectives of three-dimensional modeling of geodetic surveys in the assessment of real estate. EarthDoc. Online Geoscience Database. pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022590047
18. Kyseleva O. O., Kyselev Yu. O., Sopov D. S. (2025) Modern scientific theoretical concepts of research into land use problems in Ukraine. German International Journal of Modern Science. № 118. pp. 21–23. URL: https://dizzw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Deutsche-internationale-Zeitschrift-für-
zeitgenössische-Wissenschaft-№118-2025.pdf
19. Koshkalda I., Dombrovska O., Stoiko N., Kulbaka O., Kulbaka V. (2025) Land management and land quality assessment tools for effective land resources management in the context of sustainable development.
Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. № 5. pp. 244–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2025-5/244
20. Shevchuk S. M., Domashenko G. T., Koshil E. A. (2025) Economic principles of optimizing the land use structure of a territorial community for sustainable development of agricultural landscapes. Current problems of sustainable development. Volume 2. № 9. pp. 123–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60022/2(9)-15S
21. Sopov D., Tatarchuk Yu., Sopova N., Khainus D., Maslova N. (2025) Monitoring of non-forest peat fires in the Lubny district of Poltava region using remote sensing methods. EarthDoc. Online Geoscience Database. pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202552089
22. Chetverikov B. V. (2022) Methodology for using remote sensing data in assessing the consequences of emergencies: monograph / B. V. Chetverikov, I. V. Kalynych; reviewers: L. M. Datsenko, I. S. Trevogo, N. I. Kablak; Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Uzhhorod National University. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 120 p.
23. Sopov D. S., Sopova N. V. (2025) Application of remote sensing data of the Earth and information of the state land cadastre for detection and mapping of peat fire foci. Improvement of methods of geodetic, cartographic and geoinformation support of land management, cadastre and land monitoring: collective monograph; DBTU. Kharkiv: FOP Panov A. M., pp. 174–239. URL: https://repo.btu.kharkiv.ua/items/c7209740-2bb9-458a-b3dd-a5145f15d11e
24. Bespalko R., Kazimir I., Hutsul T. (2021) Problematic moments of training and formation of specialists in specialty 193 «Geodesy and land management». Technical sciences and technologies. № 1(23), pp. 198–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5363-2021-1(23)-198-207
25. Zaporozhets T. (2026) Digitalization of public administration of regional development as a factor in ensuring the economic security of the state: challenges and opportunities for capitalizing on territorial potential. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences. № 350(1). pp. 294–300. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2026-350-39
26. Braslavska O., Nesterenko S., Gerasymchuk O. (2025) Remote geodetic monitoring: a key tool for sustainable land resources management. Urban planning and territorial planning. № 89. pp. 488–502. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2025.89.488-502
27. Lei Ma, Yu Liu, Xueliang Zhang, Yuanxin Ye, Gaofei Yin, Brian Alan Johnson (2019). Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Volume 152. pp. 166–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015
28. Yakovenko D. (2025) Digital transformation of public administration as a factor in increasing the efficiency of territorial development in the context of European integration. Bulletin of the Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education. Series: Public management and administration. № 9(2). pp. 68–75. DOI: https://doi.
org/10.54891/2786-698X-2025-2-7
29. Goncharenko T. (2022) Modern information technologies for modeling the urban environment and developing digital twins of urban objects. Management of complex systems development. № 51. pp. 87–93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.51.87-93
30. Sheremet D., Rybalchenko G., Veresyuk A., Malyarenko O., Chernenko M., Storozhuk O., Davydenko O. (2025) New urban concepts: sustainable development, digitalization and spatial planning. Spatial development. № 12. pp. 321–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2025.12.321-333
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Дмитро Сергійович Сопов, Надія Валеріївна Сопова, Дмитро Дмитрович Хайнус (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Facebook page
Telegram channel