NEURAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES IN THE MARKETING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF ENTERPRISES

Authors

  • Viktoriia Shashko Author
  • Oleksandr Ruzhynskas Author
  • Yaroslav Bondaryev Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60022/3(1)-41S

Keywords:

neural network technologies, marketing management, digital transformation, enterprises, logistics crisis

Abstract

The article examines the theoretical foundations of neural network technologies application in the marketing management system of industrial enterprises. The relevance of artificial intelligence implementation as an adaptive marketing tool under logistics crisis conditions caused by the wartime state in Ukraine and global supply chain disruptions is substantiated. It is established that traditional marketing  analysis tools demonstrate insufficient efficiency under conditions of sharp market uncertainty growth, demand volatility, and sales channel reorientation, which are characteristic of crisis phenomena. A typology of neural network architectures according to marketing management functions is systematized: LSTM and GRU for demand forecasting, CNN for consumer segmentation, Transformer for NLP competitive environment monitoring, and Autoencoder for anomaly detection in logistics flows. An original concept of the Neural Network Marketing Management System (NNMMS) operating at three levels — operational, tactical, and strategic — is proposed and described. A comparative analysis of traditional and neural network-based management systems is conducted across seven criteria: decision-making speed, forecasting accuracy, disruption response, unstructured data processing, scalability, implementation cost, and ERP/CRM integration. It is established that LSTM model implementation reduces demand forecasting error from ±15–25% to ±5–8%. A SWOT matrix for neural network technology deployment in industrial enterprises’ marketing activities is developed, considering wartime conditions and the European integration context. Three priority directions for digital transformation of marketing functions are identified: real-time LSTM-based analytics, NLP-driven competitive environment monitoring, and autoencoder-based logistics anomaly detection with potential reduction of supply disruption losses by 18–27%. The research results form a methodological basis for further development of neural network management systems and marketing resilience models for industrial enterprises under crisis conditions.

References

1. Lecun Y., Bengio Y., Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015. Vol. 521, No. 7553. P. 436–444. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539.

2. Goodfellow I., Bengio Y., Courville A. Deep Learning. Cambridge : MIT Press, 2016. 800 p.

3. Собчук В. В., Барабаш О. В., Мусієнко А. П. Основи забезпечення функціональної стійкості інформаційних систем підприємств в умовах впливу дестабілізуючих факторів : монографія. Київ : Міленіум, 2022. 272 с.

4. Yang M., Lim M. K., Qu Y., Ni D., Xiao Z. Supply chain risk management with machine learning technology: A literature review and future research directions. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2023. Vol. 175. P. 108859. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108859.

5. Pietukhov R., Ahtamad M., Faraji-Niri M., El-Said T. A hybrid forecasting model with logistic regression and neural networks for improving key performance indicators in supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics. 2023. Vol. 4. P. 100041. DOI: 10.1016/j.sca.2023.100041.

6. Abumohsen M., Owda A. Y., Owda M. Electrical load forecasting using LSTM, GRU, and RNN algorithms. Energies. 2023. Vol. 16, No. 5. P. 2283. DOI: 10.3390/en16052283.

7. Kassa A., Kitaw D., Stache U., Beshah B., Degefu G. Artificial intelligence techniques for enhancing supply chain resilience: A systematic literature review, holistic framework, and future research. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2023. Vol. 186. P. 109714. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109714.

8. Олімпієва Ю. І. Забезпечення функціональної стійкості виробничих процесів промислових підприємств на основі нейроадаптивної системи. Системи управління, навігації та зв’язку. 2024. № 3. С. 46–51. DOI: 10.26906/SUNZ.2024.3.046.

9. Wang C.-C., Chien C.-H., Trappey A. J. C. On the application of ARIMA and LSTM to predict order demand based on short lead time and on-time delivery requirements. Processes. 2021. Vol. 9, No. 7. P. 1157. DOI: 10.3390/pr9071157.

10. Punia S., Shankar S. Predictive analytics for demand forecasting: a deep learning-based decision support system. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2022. Vol. 258. P. 109956. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109956.

11. Ivanov D., Dolgui A. A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control. 2021. Vol. 32, No. 9. P. 775–788. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450.

12. Al-Banna A., Rana Z. A., Yaqot M., Menezes B. Interconnectedness between supply chain resilience, industry 4.0, and investment. Logistics. 2023. Vol. 7, No. 3. P. 50. DOI: 10.3390/logistics7030050.

13. Aljohani A. Predictive analytics and machine learning for real-time supply chain risk mitigation and agility. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 20. P. 15088. DOI: 10.3390/su152015088.

14. Koç E., Türkoğlu M. Forecasting of medical equipment demand and outbreak spreading based on deep long short-term memory network: the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Signal, Image and Video Processing. 2022. Vol. 16, No. 3. P. 613–621. DOI: 10.1007/s11760-020-01847-5.

15. Smyth C., Dennehy D., Fosso Wamba S., Scott M., Harfouche A. Artificial intelligence and prescriptive analytics for supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research. 2024. Vol. 62, No. 23. P. 8537–8561. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2341415.

Published

2026-01-15

How to Cite

Shashko, V., Ruzhynskas, O., & Bondaryev, Y. (2026). NEURAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES IN THE MARKETING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF ENTERPRISES. Current Problems of Sustainable Development, 3(1), 338-343. https://doi.org/10.60022/3(1)-41S