INFRASTRUCTURE DIPLOMACY AS A TOOL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A GEOPOLITICAL DIMENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/3(6)-15SKeywords:
infrastructure diplomacy, geopolitics, Belt and Road Initiative, Global Gateway, PGIIAbstract
The article examines the phenomenon of infrastructure diplomacy and its instrumental significance as a means of sustainable development in the context of geopolitical influence and strategic competition between leading global actors. The evolution of geopolitical thought from the classical territorial concepts of Mackinder, Mahan, and Spykman to the modern infrastructure turn, in which control over infrastructure becomes a defining dimension of international influence, is analyzed. The analysis considers four key global strategies: the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the EU Global Gateway Initiative, and the Blue Dot Network (BDN), Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) pursued by the US and its allies. A comparative analysis of these initiatives is carried out according to the criteria of financial volume, type of financing, regulatory conditions, speed of implementation, and geopolitical goals. It is substantiated that modern infrastructure functions as a mechanism for the formation of long-term dependencies, standardization, and projection of soft power. The significance of the Global Gateway initiative for Ukraine in the context of reconstruction and the European integration course is separately considered.
References
1. Кіссінджер Г. Світовий порядок. Київ : Наш Формат, 2025. 368 с.
2. Bastos da Silva F. Understanding the EU’s Global Gateway through the lens of role theory: adjusting its role enactment to defend the liberal order. International Relations. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251411835
3. Brzezinski Z. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Basic Books, 1997. 240 c.
4. EUR-Lex - 12016E209 - EN - EUR-Lex. Europa.Eu. 2016. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2016/art_209/oj/eng
5. EUR-Lex - 12016E212 - EN - EUR-Lex. Europa.Eu. 2016. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/treaty/tfeu_2016/art_212/oj/eng
6. European Commission. Joint Communication: The Global Gateway. JOIN(2021). 30 final. 2021. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/document/download/461c4d47-86b1-46a2-a20a-9fcad0bce90f_en?filename=joint_communication_global_gateway.pdf
7. García-Herrero A. David and Goliath: The EU’s Global Gateway versus China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Bruegel. 2024. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://www.bruegel.org/newsletter/david-and-goliath-eus-global-gateway-versus-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative
8. Global Gateway: Council endorses flagship project list for 2026. Council of the European Union. 10 Dec. 2025. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/12/10/global-gateway-council-endorses-flagship-project-list-for-2026
9. Global Gateway Forum: EU and IFC sign equity guarantee agreement to mobilise private investments Ukraine. October 10. 2025. Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://
enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/global-gateway-forum-eu-and-ifc-sign-equity-guarantee-agreement-mobilise-private-investments-ukraine-2025-10-10_en
10. Haushofer K. An English Translation and Analysis of Major General Karl Ernst Haushofer’s Geopolitics of the Pacific Ocean. The Edwin Mellen Press, 2002. 402 с.
11. Heldt E. C. Europe’s Global Gateway: A New Instrument of Geopolitics. Politics and Governance. 2023. Vol. 11, Issue 4. с. 223-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7098
12. Holdar S. The ideal state and the power of geography: The life-work of Rudolf Kjellen. Political Geography. 1992. Vol. 11, №3. с. 307-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(92)90031-N
13. Huntington S. P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York : Simon & Schuster, 1996. 368 с.
14. International Partnerships. Global Gateway. April 24. 2026. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/policies/global-gateway_en
15. Keijzer N. The Southernization of the EU’s Development Policy? A Critical Review of the EU Global Gateway. Emerging Trends in International Development and Climate Policy / eds. S. Klingebiel, T. Kalinowski, N. Keijzer. Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. с. 85-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65671-2_7
16. Luttwak E. N. From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest. 1990. № 20. с. 17-23.
17. Mackinder H. J. The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal. 1904. Vol. 23, № 4. с. 421-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1775498
18. Mahan A. T. The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660-1783. Boston : Little, Brown and Company, 1890. 644 с.
19. Ó Tuathail G. Understanding critical geopolitics: Geopolitics and risk society. Journal of Strategic Studies. 1999. Vol. 22, № 2-3. с. 107-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402399908437756
20. Regulation - 2021/947 - EN - EUR-Lex. 2021. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/947/oj
21. REPORT on Global Gateway – past impacts and future orientation. European Pariliament. March 5. 2026. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0045_
EN.html
22. Smith W. D. Friedrich Ratzel and the Origins of Lebensraum. German Studies Review. 1980. Vol. 3, №1. с. 51-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1429483
Spykman N. J. America’s Strategy in World Politics. New York : Harcourt, Brace and Company, 23. 1942. 524 с.
24. Sustainable Development Goals. UNDP. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals
25. Ukraine Investment Framework. Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood. April 23. 2026. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/countries/ukraine/ukraine-investment-
framework_en
26. Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. Asia Pacific Energy Portal. 2015. [Електронний ресурс] URL: https://policy.asiapacificenergy.org/sites/default/files/Vision%20and%20Actions%20on%20Jointly%20Building%20Silk%20Road%20Economic%20Belt%20and%2021st-Century%20Maritime%20Silk%20Road%20%28EN%29.pdf
27. Wei Z., Zhang Y. The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and China-U.S. Strategic Competition. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies. 2021. Vol. 7, № 2. с. 157-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740021500068
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Микита Андрійович Сімонов (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Facebook page
Telegram channel