THE CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL ORDER: ESSENCE, CRISIS, AND ALTERNATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/3(6)-8SKeywords:
international order, international system, Liberal International Order, crisis, multipolarizationAbstract
The profound transformations of world politics in the early twenty-first century, associated with the global financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, intensifying great-power competition, the rise of China, Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, the spread of nationalism and populism, and the erosion of American hegemony, indicate the crisis of the contemporary international order and bring to the forefront the question of its future and possible alternatives. The article examines the principal theoretical approaches to understanding international order developed within Liberal Institutionalism, Realism, and the English School of International Relations. It argues that international order can be understood as a system of norms, institutions, rules, and mechanisms of interstate interaction that ensures a relative degree of stability and predictability in international relations. Particular attention is devoted to the concept of the Liberal International Order and its evolution from the post-war order led by the United States to the globalized order of the unipolar era. The study demonstrates that the crisis of the Liberal International Order is complex in nature and stems from both its internal contradictions and structural changes in the international system. Among the key factors contributing to its decline are the redistribution of global power, the rise of new centres of influence, the consequences of hyperglobalization, the growth of nationalism, and the limited capacity of international institutions to adapt to emerging challenges. The article also reviews the views of leading scholars regarding the prospects for preserving, reforming, or dismantling the Liberal International Order. Based on an analysis of contemporary trends, the study identifies the main alternatives to the future international order, including unipolar, bipolar, multipolar, and nonpolar models. Special attention is paid to the concept of a multiplex order as a possible form of post-Western organization of international relations.
References
1. Ikenberry G. John. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 293 p.
2. Ikenberry G. John. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. 392 р.
3. Ikenberry G. John. A World Safe for Democracy: Liberal Internationalism and the Crises of Global Order. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020. 432 р.
4. Kissinger H. World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History. New York: Penguin Press, 2014. 420.
5. Allison G. The Myth of the Liberal Order: From Historical Accident to Conventional Wisdom. Foreign Affairs. 2018. Vol. 97, № 4. Р. 124-133.
6. Haas R. How a World Order Ends. And What Comes in Its Wake. Foreign Affairs. January / February 2019. Vol. 98, № 1. Р. 22–30.
7. Glaser С. L. A Flawed Framework: Why the Liberal International Order Concept Is Misguided. International Security. 2019. Vol. 43, №4. P. 51–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00343
8. Acharya A. Constructing Global Order: Agency and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 215 p.
9. Mearsheimer J.J. Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order. International Security. Spring 2019. Vol. 43, № 4. Р. 7–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00342
10. Schweller R. L. Broken Cycle: World Politics in the Age of Dissent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026. 323 p.
11. Kagan R. The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World. New York: Knopf, 2018. 192 р.
12. Munich Security Report 2025: Multipolarization / Edited by Tobias Bunde, Sophie Eisentraut and Leonard Schütte. Munich: Munich Security Conference, February 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47342/EZUC8623
13. Munich Security Report 2026: Under Destruction / Edited by Tobias Bunde and Sophie Eisentraut. Munich: Munich Security Conference, February 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47342/JWIE5806
14. Jervis R., Labrosse D. N., Goddard S.E., Rovner J. Introduction. Chaos Reconsidered: The Liberal Order and the Future of International Politics / Еdited by Robert Jervis, Diane N. Labrosse, Stacie E. Goddard, and Joshua Rovner; with George Fujii. New York: Columbia University Press, 2023. P. 1–11.
15. Bull H. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Third Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. 329 p.
16. Cooley A., Nexon D. Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. 305 p.
17. Schweller R. L. Trump’s Realism. Chaos Reconsidered: The Liberal Order and the Future of International Politics / Еdited by Robert Jervis, Diane N. Labrosse, Stacie E. Goddard, and Joshua Rovner; with George Fujii. New York: Columbia University Press, 2023. P. 55–64.
18. National Security Strategy. October 2022. The White House: website. URL: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf (Last accessed: 15.04.2026).
19. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. November 2025. The White House: website. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/ 2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy. pdf (Last accessed: 15.04.2026).
20. Arnsdorf I., Birnbaum M., Lee M. In pageantry and politics, China summit yields Xi’s goal – equal footing with U.S. The Washington Post. May 15, 2026. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/05/15/beijing-summit-yields-chinese-goal-equal-footing-with-us/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
(Last accessed: 16.04.2026).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Сергій Вікторович Шуляк, Олег Вікторович Морозов (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.