FORMATION OF A CONTEXT-SENSITIVE AND ADAPTIVE MODEL OF AN ETHICS-ORIENTED CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR UKRAINIAN ENTERPRISES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/3(4)-42SKeywords:
corporate social responsibility, ethics-oriented management, management system, stakeholders, due diligence, adaptive governance, Ukrainian enterprises, recoveryAbstract
The article substantiates the theoretical, methodological and applied foundations for developing a context-adaptive model of an ethically oriented corporate social responsibility management system for Ukrainian enterprises. It is argued that under the conditions of war, European integration, labour shortages, infrastructure losses, resource constraints and increasing expectations from international partners, corporate social responsibility (CSR) should not be interpreted as a set of isolated charitable, reputational or reporting practices. Instead, CSR should be considered an integrated subsystem of enterprise management that affects strategic planning, organizational structure, distribution of authority, stakeholder interaction, internal control and adaptive decision-making. The study emphasizes that Ukrainian enterprises operate in a specific environment where security risks, recovery needs, institutional transformation and compliance with European standards require a systematic approach to CSR management. The article proposes an author’s definition of an ethically oriented CSR management system and clarifies its principles, structural blocks, process mechanism and contour of managerial decision-making. Particular attention is paid to the ethical criterion, which is interpreted not as a formal declaration of corporate values, but as a system-forming element of CSR management. Within the proposed model, ethics determines the boundaries of acceptable managerial alternatives, the prioritization of CSR objectives, the distribution of responsibility, the formation of performance indicators and corrective actions. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a context-adaptive model of ethics-oriented CSR management which, unlike traditional CSR models, is not limited to defining the areas of social responsibility, but embeds the ethical criterion directly into the logic of managerial decision-making. In contrast to the reporting and compliance-oriented interpretation of the ESG approach, the proposed model focuses not only on the disclosure and comparability of non-financial information, but also on the integration of ethical boundaries of admissibility, contextual risks, distribution of responsibility, control procedures and adaptive adjustment of managerial actions. The article also proposes an integral index of ethical management maturity of the CSR system, which makes it possible to assess not only the formal existence of policies and procedures, but also the process completeness, actual effectiveness and adaptability of the main blocks of the model. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of applying the model to distribute managerial responsibilities, organize ethical screening of decisions, develop KPIs, ensure stakeholder engagement, conduct internal CSR audits and adaptively revise responsible management policies with due regard to the sectoral, resource-related and security conditions of Ukrainian enterprises.
References
1. Bowen H. R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1953. 276 p.
2. Davis K. Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review. 1960. Vol. 2, No. 3. P. 70–76.
3. McGuire J. W. Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. 312 p.
4. Carroll A. B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons. 1991. Vol. 34, Issue 4. P. 39–48. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
5. Freeman R. E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston : Pitman, 1984. 276 p.
6. Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review. 2006. Vol. 84, № 12. P. 78-92.
7. Aguinis H., Glavas A. What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management. 2012. Vol. 38, No. 4. P. 932–968. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079 (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
8. Donaldson T., Preston L. E. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20, No. 1. P. 65–91.
9. Clarkson M. B. E. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20, No. 1. P. 92–117.
10. Wood D. J. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review. 1991. Vol. 16, No. 4. P. 691–718.
11. Matten D., Moon J. “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review. 2008. Vol. 33, No. 2. P. 404–424.
12. ISO. ISO 26000 – Social responsibility. URL: https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
13. United Nations Global Compact. The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. URL: https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
14. OHCHR. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. URL: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
15. OECD. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-guidelines-for-multinational-
enterprises-on-responsible-business-conduct_81f92357-en.html (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
16. UNDP Ukraine. Responsible Business Conduct During War in Ukraine: Context Assessment Study. 2023. URL: https://www.undp.org/ukraine/publications/responsible-business-conduct-during-war-ukraine-context-assessment-study (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
17. World Bank. Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment Released. 2026. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2026/02/23/updated-ukraine-recovery-and-
reconstruction-needs-assessment-released (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
18. OECD. OECD Integrity and Anti-Corruption Review of Ukraine. 2025. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/05/oecd-integrity-and-anti-corruption-review-of-ukraine_4d9e5ab7.html (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
19. European Business Association. Three quarters of employers are experiencing staff shortages in Ukraine. 2024. URL: https://eba.com.ua/en/try-chverti-robotodavtsiv-vidchuvayut-defitsyt-kadriv-v-ukrayini (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
20. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. Human Capital Resilience Charter. 2025. URL: https://charter.me.gov.ua/media/Human%20Capital%20Resilience%20 Charter_250701_132205.pdf (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
21. UNHCR. Ukraine Situation: UNHCR’s 2026 plans and financial requirements. URL: https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/120716 (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
22. European Commission. Corporate sustainability reporting. URL: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
23. European Commission. Corporate sustainability due diligence. URL: https://commission.europa.eu/topics/business-and-industry/doing-business-eu/sustainability-due-diligence-responsible-business/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en (дата звернення: 10.03.2026).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Юрій Олексійович Єжелий (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.