AUTOMATED INVESTMENT DECISIONS BY RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE STOCK MARKET IN THE CONTEXT OF USING MODERN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS

Authors

  • Olesia Ananieva Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60022/3(2)-45S

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, automated investment decisions, robo-advising, stock market, retail investor, algorithmic portfolio management, model risk, explainable AI, regulatory supervision

Abstract

The article examines the role of artificial intelligence in the system of automated investment decisions in the stock market, taking into account international experience and the Ukrainian context. It is substantiated that modern artificial intelligence tools are no longer limited to technical forecasting of price series but form a broader decision-support architecture that includes investor profiling, processing of market and financial data, risk assessment, portfolio recommendation, suitability control, and explanation of the proposed action. In this approach, an automated investment system is considered not as an autonomous substitute for an investor or a financial adviser, but as an infrastructure component that increases the speed, formalization, and traceability of investment decision-making. The purpose of the article is to develop a conceptual and applied approach to the use of artificial intelligence in the system of automated investment decisions of a retail investor in the stock market and to determine the conditions for its adaptation to the Ukrainian market and regulatory environment. The methodological basis of the article combines comparative analysis of international regulatory practices, a synthesis of academic research on machine learning, robo-advising, deep learning and reinforcement learning in finance, and the economic interpretation of official statistical data from the EU, the United States, Canada, and Ukraine. As a result of the study, a structural model of an automated investment system is proposed. It includes an input data block, information quality checks, an AI analytical module, an economic suitability filter, a control and explanation layer, and a recommendation output block. The article shows that the international experience of the United States, the European Union, Canada, and IOSCO is gradually shifting from technological enthusiasm to requirements for governance, accountability, disclosure, and continuous supervision of models. For Ukraine, the article substantiates the feasibility of using artificial intelligence primarily as a decisionsupport system rather than a fully autonomous trading mechanism, given the structure of the organized market, the dominance of debt instruments, uneven liquidity, and the need to strengthen institutional trust. The practical significance of the results lies in the development of methodological guidelines for brokers, investment advisers, fintech companies, and regulators that may be used in designing automated investment modules, robo-advising services, risk-control systems, and educational tools for retail investors. Further research should focus on empirical testing of the proposed approach using Ukrainian and international market data, comparing the effectiveness of different model classes, developing criteria for the explainability of investment recommendations, and defining minimum requirements for auditing algorithmic decisions in the financial sector.

References

1. Alsabah H., Capponi A., Ruiz Lacedelli O., Stern M. Robo-advising: learning investors’ risk preferences via portfolio choices. Journal of Financial Econometrics. 2021. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 369-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbz040

2. Brenner L., Meyll T. Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 2020. Vol. 25. 100275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100275

3. Buehler H., Gonon L., Teichmann J., Wood B. Deep hedging. Quantitative Finance. 2019. Vol. 19. No. 8. P. 1271-1291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2019.1571683

4. Cardillo G., Chiappini H. Robo-advisors: A systematic literature review. Finance Research Letters. 2024. Vol. 62. 105119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105119

5. D’Acunto F., Prabhala N., Rossi A. G. The promises and pitfalls of robo-advising. The Review of Financial Studies. 2019. Vol. 32. No. 5. P. 1983-2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz014

6. Fischer T., Krauss C. Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research. 2018. Vol. 270. No. 2. P. 654-669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.054

7. Gu S., Kelly B., Xiu D. Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies. 2020. Vol. 33. No. 5. P. 2223-2273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa009

8. Hambly B., Xu R., Yang H. Recent advances in reinforcement learning in finance. Mathematical Finance. 2023. Vol. 33. No. 3. P. 437-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12382

9. Heaton J. B., Polson N. G., Witte J. H. Deep learning for finance: deep portfolios. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry. 2017. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 3-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2209

10. Lucchese L., Pakkanen M. S., Veraart A. E. D. The short-term predictability of returns in order book markets: a deep learning perspective. International Journal of Forecasting. 2024. Vol. 40. No. 4. P. 1587-1621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.02.001 11. Sirignano J., Cont R. Universal features of price formation in financial markets: perspectives from deep learning. Quantitative Finance. 2019. Vol. 19. No. 9. P. 1449-1459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2019.1622295

12. European Securities and Markets Authority. Public Statement on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the provision of retail investment services. ESMA35-335435667-5924. 2024. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-05/ESMA35-335435667-5924__Public_Statement_on_AI_and_investment_services.pdf

13. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

14. International Organization of Securities Commissions. The use of artificial intelligence and machine learning by market intermediaries and asset managers. Final Report FR06/2021. 2021. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD684.pdf

15. International Organization of Securities Commissions. Artificial Intelligence in Capital Markets: Use Cases, Risks, and Challenges. Consultation Report CR/01/2025. 2025. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD788.pdf

16. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. IM Guidance Update: Robo-Advisers. No. 2017-02.2017. https://www.sec.gov/investment/im-guidance-2017-02.pdf

17. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Observations from examinations of advisers that provide electronic investment advice. Risk Alert. 2021. https://www.sec.gov/files/exams-eia-risk-alert.pdf

18. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC Charges two investment advisers with making false and misleading statements about their use of artificial intelligence. Press Release 2024-36. 18 March 2024. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-36

19. Canadian Securities Administrators. CSA Staff Notice 31-342: Guidance for Portfolio Managers Regarding Online Advice. 24 September 2015. https://www.osc.ca/en/securities-law/instruments-rulespolicies/3/31-342/csa-staff-notice-31-342-guidance-portfolio-managers-regarding-online-advice

20. Canadian Securities Administrators. CSA Staff Notice and Consultation 11-348: Applicability of Canadian Securities Laws and the use of Artificial Intelligence Systems in Capital Markets. 5 December 2024. https://www.osc.ca/sites/default/files/2024-12/csa_20241205_11-348_artificial-intelligence-systems-capitalmarkets.pdf

21. Eurostat. Use of artificial intelligence in enterprises. Statistics Explained. 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Use_of_artificial_intelligence_in_enterprises

22. Analysis on artificial intelligence use by businesses in Canada, second quarter of 2025. Statistics Canada. 16 June 2025. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/11-621-m/11-621-m2025008-eng.pdf?st=JEpk9PAs

23. National Securities and Stock Market Commission of Ukraine. Commission Activity Report 2024. 2025. https://www.nssmc.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/annual-report-nssmc-2024.pdf

24. Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. Draft Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine until 2030. 2026. https://ai-files.thedigital.gov.ua/documents/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%94%D0%BA%D1%82%20%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D1%96%D1%97%20%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BA%D1%83%20%D0%A8%D0%86%202030.docx.pdf

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

Ananieva, O. (2026). AUTOMATED INVESTMENT DECISIONS BY RETAIL INVESTORS IN THE STOCK MARKET IN THE CONTEXT OF USING MODERN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS. Current Problems of Sustainable Development, 3(2), 366-378. https://doi.org/10.60022/3(2)-45S