THE CSRD DIRECTIVE AND ESRS STANDARDS AS INSTRUMENTS FOR ENSURING TRANSPARENCY UNDER THE EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/3(5)-53SKeywords:
CSRD directive, ESRS standards, double materiality, ESG reporting, sustainable development, European Green Deal, non-financial transparencyAbstract
The article provides a comprehensive theoretical and analytical study of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) (EU) 2022/2464 and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) as key instruments for corporate transparency within the implementation of the European Green Deal strategy. The research explores the historical prerequisites for the transition from the fragmented and descriptive Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) to the more rigorous, mandatory regulatory requirements of the CSRD. The authors reveal the essence of the innovative paradigm of double materiality, which forms the core of the new methodology. The paper details the structure of the IROs framework (impacts, risks, and opportunities) analyzed across significance and probability scales, as well as the architecture of the twelve sector-agnostic ESRS standards covering environmental (E1–E5), social (S1–S4), and governance (G1) aspects. Special attention is paid to the requirements for mandatory digital tagging of reported data using the Inline XBRL format and the transition from limited assurance to a stricter reasonable assurance of sustainability disclosures under the new International Standard on Assurance Engagements ISSA 5000. Based on global and domestic academic discussions, the article evaluates the long-term strategic opportunities for the European capital market and identifies key structural challenges faced by companies. These include excessive regulatory burden, non-financial data quality gaps, high deployment costs of ESG accounting systems, and the persistent risks of formal compliance, often referred to as greenwashing. Finally, the study highlights the prospects, deep methodological challenges, and practical significance of implementing the CSRD/ESRS provisions in Ukraine. In the context of European integration commitments and the post-war recovery based on green growth, adopting these standards is identified as a strategic foundation for Ukrainian enterprises, particularly in the agricultural sector, to secure direct access to international financial capital and seamlessly integrate into global value chains. To achieve this, the authors emphasize the critical need to overcome the shortage of skilled ESG auditors, modernize digital IT infrastructure for accounting, and establish technical cooperation with EFRAG to account for the wartime specificities of the national economy. The study systematizes the structural components of the “Strategy for the Introduction of Sustainability Reporting by Enterprises” in Ukraine and identifies the institutional mechanisms for its practical implementation.
References
1. European Commission. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission COM(2019) 640 final. Brussels, 11.12.2019.
2. Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality (European Climate Law). Official Journal of the European Union. 2021. L 243, 9.7.2021.
3. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Official Journal of the European Union. 2022. L
322, 16.12.2022.
4. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU as regards sustainability reporting standards. Official Journal of the European Union. 2023. L, 22.12.2023.
5. PwC. The promise and reality of CSRD reporting — Global CSRD Survey 2024. URL: https://www.pwc.nl/en/insights-and-publications/themes/sustainability/global-csrd-survey-2024.html (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
6. Bebbington J., Larrinaga C. Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2014. Vol. 39, No. 6. P. 395–413.
7. Bebbington J., Unerman J. Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2018. Vol. 31, No. 1.
P. 2–24.
8. García-Sánchez I. M. et al. How does the European Green Deal affect the disclosure of environmental information? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2023. URL: https://
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csr.2514 (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
9. Hereu-Morales J., Segalàs J., Turon X. The European (Green?) Deal: a systematic analysis of environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development. 2024. Vol. 32, No. 1. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sd.2671 (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
10. Lindgren C. et al. From Double Materiality to Performance: Conceptualizing Reporting Under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2025. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.70714 (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
11. Детермінанти аудиту звітності про сталий розвиток: емпіричний аналіз практик у країнах Азії / К. В. Безверхий та ін. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2025. Т. 5, № 64. URL: https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/article/view/4885 (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
12. Особливості аудиту звітності про сталий розвиток: емпіричний досвід країн Європейського Союзу / К. Безверхий та ін. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2025. № 3 (62). С. 79–94. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.62.2025.4735.
13. Чмут А. В. CSRD як інструмент стійкого відновлення України: перспективи впровадження стандартів ESG-звітності. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: Економічні науки. 2024. URL: https://ej.journal.kspu.edu/index.php/ej/article/view/896 (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
14. Серпенінова І. М. Історичний генезис інтегрованої звітності. Вісник Економіки. 2024. URL: http://visnykj.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/visnykj/article/view/1336 (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
15. Костирко Р. О., Ліснича Т. В. Інтегрована звітність – інструмент забезпечення сталого розвитку суспільства. Економіка. Менеджмент. Підприємництво. 2012. № 24 (1). С. 189–195.
16. European Central Bank. Opinion of the European Central Bank of 8 May 2025 on a proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on corporate sustainability reporting (CON/2025/10). Official Journal of the European Union. 2025. URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
17. EFRAG. Press release: EFRAG Shares Revised ESRS Exposure Drafts and Launches 60-Day Public Consultation. 31.07.2025; Draft Simplified ESRS, 03.12.2025. URL: https://www.efrag.org/en/draft-
simplified-esrs (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
18. EFRAG. Study: State of play as of Q2 2024 — Implementation of European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS): Initial Practices from Selected Companies. 2024. URL: https://www.efrag.org/en/news-and-calendar/news/efrag-releases-study-on-early-implementation-of-esrs (дата звернення: 07.04.2026).
19. Кабінет Міністрів України. Про схвалення Стратегії запровадження підприємствами звітності із сталого розвитку: розпорядження Кабінету Міністрів України від 18 жовт. 2024 р. № 1015-р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1015-2024-р#Text (дата звернення: 08.04.2026).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Марина Миколаївна Кругла, Людмила Ігорівна Лежненко, Владислав Володимирович Круглий (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.