PREVENTIVE TELEMEDICINE AS A COMPONENT OF ENSURING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AT THE MICROLEVEL

Authors

  • Yuliia Chaliuk Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60022/3(5)-4S

Keywords:

telemedicine, social services, healthcare services, efficiency of healthcare digitalization, competitiveness, micro level

Abstract

The article examines the role of preventive telemedicine as a factor in ensuring the competitiveness of healthcare providers at the micro level in the context of digital transformation of healthcare and the growing emphasis on preventive care. The application of bibliographic, comparative, and structural-logical analysis of contemporary international and Ukrainian scientific publications made it possible to trace the impact of preventive telemedicine on healthcare accessibility, continuity of patient monitoring, missed appointment rates, patient convenience, and the efficiency of resource utilization in medical organizations. It has been established that its impact is realized through the restructuring of preventive patient pathways, optimization of contact structures, and improved manageability of healthcare delivery processes. A functional model of a medical organization has been identified in which preventive telemedicine is not an isolated digital service but an integrated element of the preventive care framework, ensuring the formation of competitive advantages through a systemic combination of accessibility, continuity, and organizational efficiency. It has been established that competitive advantage at the micro level is not created by the digital telemedicine channel itself, but by its systematic integration into the preventive framework of a medical organization. Additionally, the findings suggest that the effectiveness of preventive telemedicine depends on organizational readiness, standardized clinical and managerial protocols, interoperable digital infrastructure, and coordinated information systems, while hybrid models combining face-to-face and telemedicine consultations are more effective than fully digital or traditional approaches in ensuring continuity and quality of preventive care; the study also emphasizes outcome-based evaluation and the need for quantitative metrics to assess its contribution to healthcare providers’ competitiveness. The evidence base, including scoping reviews of preventive digital interventions in primary care, confirms the overall effectiveness of telemedicine-based solutions, with a high proportion of studies reporting statistically significant improvements in preventive outcomes. In the context of Ukrainian healthcare, the implementation of preventive telemedicine is additionally shaped by institutional readiness and systemic constraints, while simultaneously contributing to reducing territorial disparities in access to medical services and strengthening the resilience of healthcare delivery at the provider level.

References

1. Willis V. C., Thomas Craig K. J., Jabbarpour Y., Scheufele E. L., Arriaga Y. E., Ajinkya M., Rhee K. B., Bazemore A. Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2022. Vol. 10, no. 1. Article e33518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/33518 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

2. Mahdavi S., Fekri M., Mohammadi-Sarab S., Mehmandoost M., Zarei E. The use of telemedicine in family medicine: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research. 2025. Vol. 25. Article 376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12449-7 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

3. Adler L., Vered S., Amran M. M., Zacay G., Bar-Ratson E., Cohen B., Yehoshua I. The Effect of Telemedicine on Preventive Medicine – A Case from Israel. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research. 2025. Vol. 14. Article 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00696-2 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

4. Velayati F., Ayatollahi H., Hemmat M., Dehghan R. Telehealth Business Models and Their Components: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2022. Vol. 24, no. 3. Article e33128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/33128 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

5. Goetz D. Telemedicine competition, pricing, and technology adoption: Evidence from talk therapists. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2023. Vol. 89. Article 102956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.102956 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

6. Alanazi A. T., Al Hader B. Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction and Cost: A Comparative Study in the COVID-19 Era. Cureus. 2022. Vol. 14, no. 10. Article e30671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30671 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

7. Campbell K., Greenfield G., Li E., O’Brien N., Hayhoe B., Beaney T., Majeed A., Neves A. L. The Impact of Virtual Consultations on the Quality of Primary Care: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023. Vol. 25. Article e48920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/48920 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

8. Mabeza R. M. S., Maynard K., Tarn D. M. Influence of synchronous primary care telemedicine versus in-person visits on diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Primary Care. 2022. Vol. 23, no. 1. Article 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01662-6 (дата

звернення: 19.03.2026).

9. Zacay G., Adler L., Schonmann Y., Azuri J., Yehoshua I., Vinker S., Heymann A. D., Afek S., Golan Cohen A., Green I., Hoffman R., Shani M. “A day in the life” – telemedicine in family medicine and its relationship with physicians’ satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research. 2024. Vol. 13. Article 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-024-00624-w (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

10. Haque S. N., DeStefano S., Banger A., Rutledge R., Romaire M. Factors Influencing Telehealth Implementation and Use in Frontier Critical Access Hospitals: Qualitative Study. JMIR Formative Research. 2021. Vol. 5, no. 5. Article e24118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/24118 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

11. Tabaeeian R. A., Hajrahimi B., Khoshfetrat A. A systematic review of telemedicine systems use barriers: primary health care providers’ perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. 2024. Vol. 15, no. 3. P. 610–635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2021-0106 (дата звернення:

19.03.2026).

12. Самофалов Д. О. Проблемні питання публічного управління імплементації медичних телекомунікаційних технологій для досягнення універсального покриття медичною послугою в охороні здоров’я України. Державне управління: удосконалення та розвиток. 2021. № 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156-2021.11.32 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

13. Макаренко М. В. Цифровізація сфери охорони здоров’я України як пріоритет публічної політики у побудові сучасних медичних сервісів. Інвестиції: практика та досвід. 2023. № 9. С. 138–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2023.9.138 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

14. Шевченко І. О. Цифрова інклюзія та цифровізація публічного управління: телемедицина. Регіональні аспекти розвитку продуктивних сил України. 2024. Вип. 29. С. 135–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/rarrpsu2024.29.135 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

15. Дзюба Д. О. та ін. Телемедицина як інструмент цифровізації охорони здоров’я. Emergency Medicine (Ukraine). 2025. Т. 21, № 2. С. 130–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.21.2.2025.1845 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

16. Серьогіна Н. О., Трегуб Д. В. Розвиток телемедицини як важливий інструмент цифровізації публічного управління в галузі охорони здоров’я в Україні. Національні інтереси України. 2025. № 11(16). С. 1367–1378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1793-2025-11(16)-1367-1378 (дата звернення:

19.03.2026).

17. Butzner M., Cuffee Y. Telehealth Interventions and Outcomes Across Rural Communities in the United States: Narrative Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021. Vol. 23, no. 8. Article e29575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/29575 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

18. Ganguli I. et al. Telemedicine Adoption and Low-Value Care Use and Spending Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2025. Vol. 185, no. 4. P. 440–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.8354 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

19. Cummins M. R. et al. Telemedicine appointments are more likely to be completed than in-person healthcare appointments: a retrospective cohort study. JAMIA Open. 2024. Vol. 7, no. 3. Article ooae059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae059 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

20. Ojinnaka C. O. et al. Telemedicine reduces missed appointments but disparities persist. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024. Vol. 67, no. 1. P. 90–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.02.012 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

21. Nakamoto C. H. et al. The impact of telemedicine on Medicare utilization, spending, and quality, 2019–22. Health Affairs. 2024. Vol. 43, no. 5. P. 691–700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01142 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

22. Reed M. et al. Telemedicine versus in-person primary care: treatment and follow-up visits. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2023. Vol. 176, no. 10. P. 1349–1357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-1335 (дата звернення: 19.03.2026).

Published

2026-05-06

How to Cite

Chaliuk, Y. (2026). PREVENTIVE TELEMEDICINE AS A COMPONENT OF ENSURING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AT THE MICROLEVEL. Current Problems of Sustainable Development, 3(5), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.60022/3(5)-4S