CRYPTOECONOMICS AS A NEW STAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSACTION COST THEORY AND FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60022/3(2)-37SKeywords:
cryptoeconomics, transaction cost theory, transaction costs, financial intermediation, blockchain, smart contracts, decentralised finance, digital assets, trust, financial infrastructure, cryptocurrency market, institutional transformationAbstract
The article substantiates that cryptoeconomics represents a new stage in the development of transaction cost theory and transforms traditional understandings of financial intermediation under the conditions of global economic digitalisation. It is argued that the emergence of cryptocurrencies, blockchain infrastructure, smart contracts, decentralised finance, and tokenised assets changes the mechanisms of coordination among economic agents, reduces dependence on classical intermediary institutions, and creates alternative ways of ensuring trust, control, and the fulfilment of financial obligations. The article examines and substantiates that in classical transaction cost theory, a central role is assigned to the costs of information search, contract negotiation, monitoring of contract fulfilment, protection of property rights, and the minimisation of opportunistic behaviour. Within the traditional financial system, a significant share of these functions is carried out by banks, exchanges, payment systems, depositories, clearing institutions, and other financial intermediaries. At the same time, the development of cryptoeconomics changes the very nature of transaction costs: some of them are automated through software code, some are transferred to the level of digital infrastructure, while others acquire new forms related to technological, regulatory, informational, and security risks. The article shows that blockchain does not eliminate transaction costs completely, but changes their structure and sources of origin. While in the traditional economy trust is mainly ensured through institutions, legal procedures, and centralised control, in cryptoeconomics it is increasingly formed through algorithmic verification, consensus mechanisms, the transparency of distributed ledgers, and the automated execution of agreements. This provides grounds for considering cryptoeconomics not only as a technological phenomenon, but also as a new institutional form of organising economic interactions. Particular attention is paid to the transformation of financial intermediation. It is determined that cryptoeconomics does not so much completely displace financial intermediaries as changes their role: from classical guarantors and controllers of transactions to operators of digital infrastructure, liquidity providers, analytical platforms, custodial services, regulatory-compliant crypto service providers, and institutional participants in the digital asset market. In this context, financial intermediation shifts from a model of centralised control to a model of infrastructural, algorithmic, and network-based coordination. It is proven that cryptoeconomics creates a dual effect for transaction cost theory: on the one hand, it reduces certain types of costs related to verification, value transfer, contract execution, and access to financial services; on the other hand, it generates new transaction costs associated with volatility, cyber risks, the complexity of using digital assets, regulatory uncertainty, information asymmetry in the crypto market, and risks of technological dependence. Therefore, cryptoeconomics should be viewed not as a simplification, but as a complication of the transaction logic of financial relations. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the conceptualisation of cryptoeconomics as a new stage in the evolution of transaction cost theory, within which trust, intermediation, and control are increasingly shifting from the institutional level to the level of digital infrastructure, algorithms, and network protocols. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of applying the proposed approach to analyse the transformation of financial intermediation, assess new forms of transaction costs in the crypto market, and develop regulatory approaches to digital financial ecosystems.
References
1. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
2. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.
3. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
4. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
5. Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297430
6. Gorton, G., & Winton, A. (2003). Financial intermediation. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 1, pp. 431–552). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01012-4
7. Merton, R. C., & Bodie, Z. (1995). A conceptual framework for analyzing the financial environment. In D. B. Crane, K. A. Froot, S. P. Mason, A. F. Perold, R. C. Merton, Z. Bodie, E. R. Sirri, & P. Tufano (Eds.), The global financial system: A functional perspective (pp. 3–31). Harvard Business School Press.
8. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
9. Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548
10. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.
11. Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.2.213
12. Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2020). Some simple economics of the blockchain. Communications of the ACM, 63(7), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359552
13. Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(4), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200
14. Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007
15. Yermack, D. (2017). Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfw074
16. Schär, F. (2021). Decentralized finance: On blockchain- and smart contract-based financial markets. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 103(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.103.153-74
17. Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., & Tang, B. W. (2020). Decentralized finance. Journal of Financial Regulation, 6(2), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaa010
18. Chen, Y., & Bellavitis, C. (2020). Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00151
19. De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674985933
20. Werbach, K. (2018). The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11449.001.0001
21. Lumineau, F., Wang, W., & Schilke, O. (2021). Blockchain governance—A new way of organizing collaborations? Organization Science, 32(2), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1379
22. Gorton, G. B., & Zhang, J. Y. (2023). Taming wildcat stablecoins. University of Chicago Law Review, 90(3), 909–972. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3888752
23. Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
24. Harvey, C. R., Ramachandran, A., & Santoro, J. (2021). DeFi and the future of finance. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119836025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Олег Сергійович Бродецький (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.